MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195035585 · doi:10.53368/ep61fcrr03

La cordillera de los Andes no es frontera. Cuerpos-territorios y medicina ancestral mapuche en contexto de pandemia

2021· article· en· W3195035585 on OpenAlex
Daiana Elisa Melón, Florencia Yanniello

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcología Política Cuadernos de debate internacional · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Education, Indigenous Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNetwork for Business Sustainability
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousGeographyEthnologyPoliticsPandemicEthnic groupPolitical scienceHumanitiesSocioeconomicsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)SociologyAnthropologyMedicineEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article analyzes the campaign «La Cordillera No Es Frontera», promoted by the Indigenous Women’s Movement for Good Living due to the situation of the machi (Mapuche health authority) Mawün Jones, from Ngulumapu (current Chilean territory), who crossed the Andes Mountain range to assist patients in Puelmapu (current Argentinian territory), and was stranded due to the isolation measures decreed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. This campaign fostered the machi´s return to her territory and also a debate on the political limits imposed by the Argentine and Chilean States on Mapuche territory and the logic of social control over indigenous women. We propose to reflect on the mountain chain as a political border, as well as a geographical, symbolic, and physical border. This implies reviewing the decisions of the States that affect people who experience ethnic and gender inequalities, and who also practice unrecognized forms of medicine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.353
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it