MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195081203 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.08.012

Reply: There is no substitution for a surgeon's eyes, but sometimes she might need glasses

2021· article· en· W3195081203 on OpenAlex
Sahar A. Saddoughi, Jacobo Moreno Garijo, Jonathan Yeung

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConflict of interestMedicinePulmonary arteryAnastomosisLung transplantationTransplantationSurgeryGeneral surgeryPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Success in lung transplantation involves a collaborative effort among surgeons, anesthesiologists, perfusionists, and operating room staff. The expertise and different perspectives of these specialties working together ultimately benefits patients. We appreciate the letter from Kumar and colleagues1 discussing the influence of cardiac anesthesiologists and, in particular, the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in lung transplantation for the assessment of pulmonary artery (PA) anastomoses, determined to be a class IIb indication by the American Society of Echocardiography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it