Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract L’anniversario dell’arrivo al Polo Sud da parte di Robert Falcon Scott nel 2012, seguito dalla sua tragica morte fra i ghiacci sulla via del ritorno, ha ridato slancio allo studio di Scott e del continente antartico. La rinascita dell’interesse per l’Antartide dimostra che il continente continua a esercitare un grande fascino sul mondo occidentale, come luogo in cui si esprimono coraggio e resistenza fisica. Il ruolo dell’Antartide in quanto spazio dell’immaginario britannico, tuttavia, appare oggi superato dal suo stato di territorio postcoloniale ‘posseduto’ sia dalle ex-potenze coloniali che dalle nazioni postcoloniali, come India o Nuova Zelanda. Il trattato antartico del 1959 ha riconosciuto alla Gran Bretagna un ruolo di primo piano all’interno degli accordi internazionali che hanno consolidato la cooperazione per la ricerca scientifica. Allo stesso tempo, molti altri paesi sono coinvolti nel progetto di fare del ‘continente bianco’ una riserva naturale interamente dedicata alla scienza. DOI:- Bibliografia: Arthur, Elizabeth. 1994. Antarctic Navigations . London: Bloomsbury. Bainbridge, Beryl. 1991. The Birthday Boys . London: Penguin. Barczewski, Stephanie. 2007. Antarctic Destinies: Scott, Shackleton, and the Changing Face of Heroism . Hambledon Continuum: London. Blackhall, Sue. 2012. Scott of the Antarctic. We Shall Die Like Gentlemen . Barnsley: Pen & Sword. Brazzelli, Nicoletta. 2012. Introduzione. Scienza, esplorazione ed eroismo. Robert Falcon Scott al Polo Sud. Acme : LXV, 3: 5-15. Brazzelli, Nicoletta. 2009. Murders, Mysteries, Names. Beryl Bainbridge e la riscrittura della Storia fra parodia postmoderna e prospettive femminili . Roma: Aracne. Carter, Paul. 1987. The Road to Botany Bay. An Essay in Spatial History . London: Faber & Faber. Crane, David. 2005. Scott of the Antarctic. A Life of Courage and Tragedy in the Extreme South . London: HarperCollins. Darieussecq, Marie. 2003. White . Paris: Pol. Dodds, Klaus. 2002. Pink Ice. Britain and the South Atlantic Empire . London: I. B. Tauris. Dodds, Klaus. 2012a. Scott of the Antarctic (1948). Geopolitics, Film and Britain’s Polar Empire. Acme : LXV, 3: 59-70. Dodds, Klaus. 2012b. The Antarctic. A Very Short Introduction . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dutton, Jacqueline. 2009. Imperial Ice? The Influence of Empire on Contemporary French and British Antarctic Travel Writing. Studies in Travel Writing : 13, 4: 369-380. Fiennes, Ranulph. 2004. Captain Scott . London: Hodder & Stoughton. Glasberg, Elena. 2011. ‘Living Ice’: Rediscovery of the Poles in an Era of Climate Crisis. Women’s Studies Quarterly : 39, 3 & 4: 221-246. Glasberg, Elena. 2012. Antarctica as Cultural Critique. The Gendered Politics of Scientific Exploration and Climate Change . New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Glasberg, Elena. 2008. Who Goes There? Science, Fiction, and Belonging in Antarctica. Journal of Historical Geography : 34: 639-657. Jones, Max. 2011. From ‘Noble Example’ to ‘Potty Pioneer’: Rethinking Scott of the Antarctic, c. 1945-2011. The Polar Journal : 1, 2: 191-206. Jones, Max. 2003. The Last Great Quest. Captain Scott ’ s Antarctic Sacrifice . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jones, Max. 2012. Why Do the British Still Remember Scott of the Antarctic? Acme : LXV, 3: 47-58. Haward, Marcus. 2011. Introduction: The Antarctic Treaty 1961-2011. The Polar Journal : 1, 1: 1-4. Larson, E. J. 2011. An Empire of Ice. Scott, Shackleton, and the Heroic Age of Antarctic Science . New Haven & London: Yale University Press. Leane, Elizabeth. 2012. Antarctica in Fiction. Imaginative Narratives of the Far South . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Le Guin, Ursula. 1982. Sur. The New Yorker : 1, February: 28-46. Le Guin, Ursula. 1969. The Left Hand of Darkness . New York: Ace Books. Huntford, Roland. 1979. Scott and Amundsen . London: Hodder & Stoughton. Preston, Diana. 1997. A First Rate Tragedy. Captain Scott ’ s Antarctic Expeditions . London: Constable. Roberts, Peder. 2011. The European Antarctic. Science and Strategy in Scandinavia and the British Empire . New York: PalgraveMacmillan. Robinson, Kim Stanley. 1997. Antarctica . London: Harpercollins. Scott,R.F.2004[1913]. Scott ’ sLastExpedition.TheJournalsofCaptainR.F. Scott . London: Pan Macmillan. Scott, S. V. 2011. Ingenious and Innocuous? Article IV of the Antarctic Treaty as Imperialism. The Polar Journal : 1, 1: 51-62. Sherrill, Grace. 2001. Canada and the Idea of the North . Montreal: McGill- Queen’s University Press. Spufford, Francis. 1996. I May be Some Time. Ice and the English Imagination . London: Faber & Faber. Turney, Chris. 2012. 1912. The Year the World Discovered Antarctica . London: The Bodley Head. Walton, David ed. 2013. Antarctica. Global Science for a Frozen Continent . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wheeler, Sara. 1996. Terra Incognita. Travels in Antarctica . London: Vintage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".