MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195109227 · doi:10.53981/destroos.v1i1.32798

Práticas jurídicas e sociais legitimadoras dos modelos econômicos liberal e neoliberal de apropriação

2021· article· pt· W3195109227 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bárbara Nascimento de Lima, Ricardo Manoel Oliveira Morais

Bibliographic record

Venue(Des)troços revista de pensamento radical · 2021
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to analyze how global power structures’ social and juridical practices employed by the capitalist model legitimize an appropriation of production. In this instance, this reaserch focus on The origin of the family, private property and the State, by Engels, articulating it with texts that actualizes the problem: The birth of biopolitics, by Foucault, Circuito dos Afetos, by Safatle, and The new way of the world, by Dardot and Laval. This research examines a social class that, without producing, appropriates the production and, as the same time, subdues the producer economically and politically. At the end, we present some of the consequences of the establishment, creation and legitimization of the division of social classes, as an attempt to "legalize" an economic exploitation of others, naturalizing a social body, and, mainly, as social practices (state, discursive, moral and legal) of subjectivity employed in this process which results in the creation of neoliberalism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.488
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue(Des)troços revista de pensamento radicalSame topicBrazilian Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207