Práticas jurídicas e sociais legitimadoras dos modelos econômicos liberal e neoliberal de apropriação
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze how global power structures’ social and juridical practices employed by the capitalist model legitimize an appropriation of production. In this instance, this reaserch focus on The origin of the family, private property and the State, by Engels, articulating it with texts that actualizes the problem: The birth of biopolitics, by Foucault, Circuito dos Afetos, by Safatle, and The new way of the world, by Dardot and Laval. This research examines a social class that, without producing, appropriates the production and, as the same time, subdues the producer economically and politically. At the end, we present some of the consequences of the establishment, creation and legitimization of the division of social classes, as an attempt to "legalize" an economic exploitation of others, naturalizing a social body, and, mainly, as social practices (state, discursive, moral and legal) of subjectivity employed in this process which results in the creation of neoliberalism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".