MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195146184 · doi:10.1139/cgj-2021-0243

Mode-based characterisation of swell deformations in a high-plasticity Paleogene clay

2021· article· en· W3195146184 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emil Mejlhede Kinslev, Ole Hededal, Irene Rocchi, Varvara Zania

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleogeneSwellPlasticityGeotechnical engineeringGeologyMode (computer interface)Stress pathMaterials scienceComposite materialPaleontologyComputer scienceCretaceous

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate prediction of soil deformations is important in unloading as well as loading. Historically, however, the loading scenario has been the most common and thus the most extensively studied phenomenon, leaving unloading less well described. Overconsolidated high-plasticity clays are particularly challenging in this regard due to their complex deformation behaviour that has previously shown two conceptually different unloading behaviours. Based on a series of incremental loading and constant rate of strain compression and swelling tests on folded Røsnæs Clay, these unloading behaviours are unified in a framework as different swell modes, and an additional swell mode is identified. These different modes represent a variation in swell-inhibiting structure, seemingly unrelated to the structure in compression. The use of constant rate of strain tests greatly enhanced the detailed description of stiffness development in each mode, which may be characterised by up to three swell phases. The parameters governing the occurrence of the swell modes are identified along with the variables that define the transition between the swell phases and their detailed development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical JournalSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Soil MechanicsFrench-language works237,207