MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195151522 · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25412-x

AHR signaling is induced by infection with coronaviruses

2021· article· en· W3195151522 on OpenAlexaff
Federico Giovannoni, Zhaorong Li, Federico Remes-Lenicov, María Eugenia Dávola, María Mercedes Elizalde, Ana Paletta, Ali A. Ashkar, Karen Mossman, Andrea Dugour, Juan Manuel Figueroa, Andrea A. Barquero, Ana Ceballos, Cybele C. Garcı́a, Francisco J. Quintana

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMosquito-borne diseases and control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthMultiple Sclerosis SocietyInternational Progressive MS AllianceUniversidad de Buenos AiresConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasNational Multiple Sclerosis Society
KeywordsAryl hydrocarbon receptorViral replicationImmunityImmunologyBiologyVirologyAntiviral drugDengue virusLungRespiratory tractCoronavirusImmune systemVirusMedicineRespiratory systemCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Transcription factorDiseasePathologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronavirus infection in humans is usually associated to respiratory tract illnesses, ranging in severity from mild to life-threatening respiratory failure. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) was recently identified as a host factor for Zika and dengue viruses; AHR antagonists boost antiviral immunity, decrease viral titers and ameliorate Zika-induced pathology in vivo. Here we report that AHR is activated by infection with different coronaviruses, potentially impacting antiviral immunity and lung epithelial cells. Indeed, the analysis of single-cell RNA-seq from lung tissue detected increased expression of AHR and AHR transcriptional targets, suggesting AHR signaling activation in SARS-CoV-2-infected epithelial cells from COVID-19 patients. Moreover, we detected an association between AHR expression and viral load in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Finally, we found that the pharmacological inhibition of AHR suppressed the replication in vitro of one of the causative agents of the common cold, HCoV-229E, and the causative agent of the COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2. Taken together, these findings suggest that AHR activation is a common strategy used by coronaviruses to evade antiviral immunity and promote viral replication, which may also contribute to lung pathology. Future studies should further evaluate the potential of AHR as a target for host-directed antiviral therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.546
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicMosquito-borne diseases and controlFrench-language works237,207