MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195273026

足部・足関節の変形性関節症~ 病態,リスクファクター,治療の最新知見~

2021· article· ja· W3195273026 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
三井 寛之, ほか

Bibliographic record

VenuePharma Medica · 2021
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

足部は2 8 個の骨から形成され,Chopart関節(横足根関節),Lisfranc関節(足根中足関節)によって大きく前足部,中足部,後足部の3つに分かれ,さらにそれぞれの部位に複数の関節が存在する(図1)。単一関節に変形性関節症(osteoarthritis:OA)が発生して問題を起こすこともあるが,隣接関節,さらには足部全体の変形につながるOAもあり,足部・足関節におけるOAの病態把握には解剖学的な知識も重要となる。 本稿では,前記3つのパートのなかから比較的頻度の高い,足関節(距腿関節),Lisfranc関節,母趾中足趾節関節(MTP関節)に発生するOAに注目し,発生要因や病態を解剖学的な視点を交えつつ解説する。さらに,診断,治療についても,治療適応を判断する上で重要となる診断のポイント,また近年注目されている関節機能温存を目指した手術療法を中心に紹介する。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharma MedicaSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207