MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195308105 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2021.3102061

Vector Magnetometer Based On Localized Scattering Between Optical Fiber Spectral Combs and Magnetic Nanoparticles

2021· article· en· W3195308105 on OpenAlexaff
Zhaochuan Zhang, Fu Liu, Qian Ma, Lijun Li, Tuan Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMagnetometerMaterials scienceOpticsCladding (metalworking)Magnetic fieldRefractive indexFiber Bragg gratingCladding modeOptical fiberMagnetic nanoparticlesWavelengthAmplitudeScatteringOptoelectronicsFiber optic sensorPhysicsNanoparticlePolarization-maintaining optical fiberNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The apparent increase in magnetic field measurement has led to a growing demand for new sensing technologies. However, a long-lasting challenge unaddressed is how to achieve ultrahigh sensitive magnetic field measurement in both amplitude and orientation. Here, we demonstrate a compact-in-size and simple-to-implement fiber-optic magnetometer for highly sensitive vector magnetic field measurement. The sensor is based on magnetic nanoparticles coated tilted fiber Bragg grating inscribed in a commercial single mode fiber. The sensing mechanism stems from the backward coupled cladding mode resonances with narrow bandwidth (Q factor &gt; 10<sup>4</sup>), which is highly sensitive to slight surface refractive index perturbation. The switching of the magnetic field direction on the surface of fiber induces redistribution of coated magnetic nanoparticles with spatial anisotropy density and scattering by formation of magnetic chains hereafter the effective index is changed, which in turn modulates the cladding mode resonance with wavelength shift and amplitude attenuation. Through calculating the peak-to-peak intensity of target cladding modes of TFBG, the external magnetic field was precisely measured with an intensity sensitivity of 0.39 dB&#x002F;mT and a direction sensitivity of 0.038 dB&#x002F;rad. The inherent core mode can be used as a reference to get rid of temperature crosstalk and light source disturbance. The proposed sensor is compact in size and easy to be used in hard-to-reach place, showing good potentials for industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.752

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207