MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3195321167 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ac215c

Simulated dose painting of hypoxic sub-volumes in pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy

2021· article· en· W3195321167 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchSouthlake Regional Health CenterUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPancreatic cancerRadiation therapyHypoxia (environmental)Radiation treatment planningCyberknifeHead and neck cancerTumor hypoxiaPancreatic tumor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Dose painting of hypoxic tumour sub-volumes using positron-emission tomography (PET) has been shown to improve tumour control in silico in several sites, predominantly head and neck and lung cancers. Pancreatic cancer presents a more stringent challenge, given its proximity to critical gastro-intestinal organs-at-risk (OARs), anatomic motion, and impediments to reliable PET hypoxia quantification. A radiobiological model was developed to estimate clonogen survival fraction (SF), using 18 F-fluoroazomycin arabinoside PET (FAZA PET) images from ten patients with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to quantify oxygen enhancement effects. For each patient, four simulated five-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans were generated: (1) a standard SBRT plan aiming to cover the planning target volume with 40 Gy, (2) dose painting plans delivering escalated doses to a maximum of three FAZA-avid hypoxic sub-volumes, (3) dose painting plans with simulated spacer separating the duodenum and pancreatic head, and (4), plans with integrated boosts to geometric contractions of the gross tumour volume (GTV). All plans saturated at least one OAR dose limit. SF was calculated for each plan and sensitivity of SF to simulated hypoxia quantification errors was evaluated. Dose painting resulted in a 55% reduction in SF as compared to standard SBRT; 78% with spacer. Integrated boosts to hypoxia-blind geometric contractions resulted in a 41% reduction in SF. The reduction in SF for dose-painting plans persisted for all hypoxia quantification parameters studied, including registration and rigid motion errors that resulted in shifts and rotations of the GTV and hypoxic sub-volumes by as much as 1 cm and 10 degrees. Although proximity to OARs ultimately limited dose escalation, with estimated SFs (∼10 −5 ) well above levels required to completely ablate a ∼10 cm 3 tumour, dose painting robustly reduced clonogen survival when accounting for expected treatment and imaging uncertainties and thus, may improve local response and associated morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and Biology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→