Humidity Dependence of the Condensational Growth of α-Pinene Secondary Organic Aerosol Particles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The influence of relative humidity (RH) on the condensational growth of organic aerosol particles remains incompletely understood. Herein, the RH dependence was investigated via a series of experiments for α-pinene ozonolysis in a continuously mixed flow chamber in which recurring cycles of particle growth occurred every 7 to 8 h at a given RH. In 5 h, the mean increase in the particle mode diameter was 15 nm at 0% RH and 110 nm at 75% RH. The corresponding particle growth coefficients, representing a combination of the thermodynamic driving force and the kinetic resistance to mass transfer, increased from 0.35 to 2.3 nm 2 s –1 . The chemical composition, characterized by O:C and H:C atomic ratios of 0.52 and 1.48, respectively, and determined by mass spectrometry, did not depend on RH. The Model for Simulating Aerosol Interactions and Chemistry (MOSAIC) was applied to reproduce the observed size- and RH-dependent particle growth by optimizing the diffusivities D b within the particles of the condensing molecules. The D b values increased from 5 α –1 × 10 –16 at 0% RH to 2 α –1 × 10 –12 cm –2 s –1 at 75% RH for mass accommodation coefficients α of 0.1 to 1.0, highlighting the importance of particle-phase properties in modeling the growth of atmospheric aerosol particles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".