Intraindividual Variability in Serum Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Levels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Measuring alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) serum levels is often the first step when investigating for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD). The purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest reproducibility of AAT serum levels and to determine if between-measurements variability was associated with acute phase markers of inflammation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a sample of 255 patients from a community respirology practice with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in whom AAT serum levels were measured twice, on separate visits. White blood cell count and fibrinogen were also measured at the time of the second blood sampling as markers of acute phase inflammation. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were used to document test-retest reproducibility. Regression analyses were used to identify potential correlates of test-retest AAT level differences. RESULTS: =173]). CONCLUSIONS: Serum AAT levels showed weak intra-individual reproducibility which could lead to AATD status misclassification and potentially a missed diagnosis of AATD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it