Optogenetic Activation of Interneuron Subtypes Modulates Visual Contrast Responses of Mouse V1 Neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interneurons are critical for information processing in the cortex. In vitro optogenetic studies in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) have sketched the connectivity of a local neural circuit comprising excitatory pyramidal neurons and distinct interneuron subtypes that express parvalbumin (Pvalb+), somatostatin (SOM+), or vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP+). However, in vivo studies focusing on V1 orientation tuning have ascribed discrepant computational roles to specific interneuron subtypes. Here, we sought to clarify the differences between interneuron subtypes by examining the effects of optogenetic activation of Pvalb+, SOM+, or VIP+ interneurons on contrast tuning of V1 neurons while also accounting for cortical depth and photostimulation intensity. We found that illumination of the cortical surface produced a similar spectrum of saturating additive photostimulation effects in all 3 interneuron subtypes, which varied with cortical depth rather than light intensity in Pvalb+ and SOM+ cells. Pyramidal cell modulation was well explained by a conductance-based model that incorporated these interneuron photostimulation effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".