MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195475993 · doi:10.7202/1080015ar

Vers une éducation au dialogue interreligieux africanisée

2021· article· fr· W3195475993 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lindbergh Mondésir

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans cet article, l’auteur cherche à saisir comment la pensée de Jean-Marc Ela peut contribuer à africaniser l’éducation au dialogue interreligieux destinée aux jeunes Africains. Il le fait à partir de la vision éducative d’Ela, selon laquelle l’école en Afrique doit être africaine, au sens d’être pensée et organisée en s’inspirant des cultures et des réalités africaines, afin de former d’authentiques Africains. Il tient aussi compte de sa conception du dialogue interreligieux, selon laquelle les croyants africains doivent accueillir le pluralisme dans le champ religieux afin que, dans le respect de leurs différences, ils puissent mettre leurs fois et croyances au service du bien commun en Afrique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.014
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0050.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThéologiquesSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207