Investigating Potential Drug-Drug Interactions from Greek e-Prescription Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) is indicative of the prevalence of actual drug-drug interactions and prescription quality. However, they are significantly understudied in Greece. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of pDDIs among outpatients and identify factors associated with their occurrence. METHODS: Anonymous e-prescription data between 2012 and 2017 were obtained from community pharmacies in Thessaloniki, Greece. Patients taking more than one medication for at least three months were included. pDDIs were identified and categorized depending on their clinical significance using Drug Interactions Checker. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of risk factors of pDDIs occurrence were identified using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: During the study period, 6,000 anonymous e-prescriptions (1,000 per year) satisfying the inclusion criteria were collected. The overall prevalence of major pDDIs was 17.4% (63.0% for moderate pDDIs). The most common major pDDIs were between amlodipine and simvastatin (22.8% of major interactions), followed by clopidogrel and omeprazole (6.4% of major interactions). Polypharmacy (≥5 concomitantly received medications) was associated with an increased risk of major pDDIs (adjusted OR, 5.72; 95% CI, 4.87-6.72); no associations were observed regarding age, sex, and number of prescribing physicians. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of pDDIs in this study was higher than previously reported in other European countries, with polypharmacy being a potential risk factor. Those results argue for a need for improvement in the area of prescribing in Greece.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it