Toward Reducing hERG Affinities for DAT Inhibitors with a Combined Machine Learning and Molecular Modeling Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psychostimulant drugs, such as cocaine, inhibit dopamine reuptake via blockading the dopamine transporter (DAT), which is the primary mechanism underpinning their abuse. Atypical DAT inhibitors are dissimilar to cocaine and can block cocaine- or methamphetamine-induced behaviors, supporting their development as part of a treatment regimen for psychostimulant use disorders. When developing these atypical DAT inhibitors as medications, it is necessary to avoid off-target binding that can produce unwanted side effects or toxicities. In particular, the blockade of a potassium channel, human ether-a-go-go (hERG), can lead to potentially lethal ventricular tachycardia. In this study, we established a counter screening platform for DAT and against hERG binding by combining machine learning-based quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) modeling, experimental validation, and molecular modeling and simulations. Our results show that the available data are adequate to establish robust QSAR models, as validated by chemical synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a validation set of DAT inhibitors. Furthermore, the QSAR models based on subsets of the data according to experimental approaches used have predictive power as well, which opens the door to target specific functional states of a protein. Complementarily, our molecular modeling and simulations identified the structural elements responsible for a pair of DAT inhibitors having opposite binding affinity trends at DAT and hERG, which can be leveraged for rational optimization of lead atypical DAT inhibitors with desired pharmacological properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".