MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Deeply Modulated Scheme for Variable-Rate Video Compression

2021· article· en· W3195524601 on OpenAlexaff
Jianping Lin, Dong Liu, Jie Liang, Houqiang Li, Feng Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion compensationComputer scienceData compressionRate–distortion optimizationEncoderAlgorithmData compression ratioBitstreamRate–distortion theoryVariable (mathematics)Motion estimationResidualArtificial intelligenceMathematicsDecoding methodsBlock-matching algorithmImage compressionImage processingVideo trackingVideo processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rate adaption is one of the decisive factors for the applications of video compression. Previous deep video compression methods are usually optimized for a single fixed rate-distortion (R-D) tradeoff. While they can achieve multiple bitrates by training multiple independent models, the achievable bitrates are limited to several discrete points on the R-D curve and the storage cost increases proportionally to the number of models. We propose a variable-rate scheme for deep video compression, which can achieve continuously variable rate by a single model, i.e., reaching any point on the R-D curve. In our scheme, two deep auto-encoders are used to compress the residual and the motion vector field respectively, which directly generate the final bitstream. The basic rate adaptation can be achieved by using the R-D tradeoff parameter to deeply modulate all the internal feature maps of the auto-encoders. In addition, other modules in our scheme, notably motion estimation and motion compensation, also affect the final bitrate indirectly. We further use the R-D tradeoff parameter to modulate them via a conditional map, thereby effectively improving the compression efficiency. We use a multi-rate-distortion loss function together with a step-by-step training strategy to optimize the entire scheme. The experimental results show the proposed scheme achieves continuously variable rate by a single model with almost the same compression efficiency as multiple fixed-rate models. The additional parameters and computation of our model are negligible when compared with a single fixed-rate model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.307

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207