MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195542925 · doi:10.1128/msystems.00816-21

Embracing Metagenomic Complexity with a Genome-Free Approach

2021· article· en· W3195542925 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuemSystems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetagenomicsMicrobiomeGenomeComputational biologyBiologyGenomicsGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A central paradigm in microbiome data analysis, which we term the genome-centric paradigm, is that a linear (non-branching) DNA sequence is the ideal representation of a microbial genome. This representation is natural, as microbes indeed have non-branching genomes. Tremendous discoveries in microbiology were made under this paradigm, but is it always optimal for microbiome research? In this Commentary, we claim that the realization of this paradigm in metagenomic assembly, a fundamental step in the "metagenomics analysis pipeline," suboptimally models the extensive genomic variability present in the microbiome. We outline our efforts to address these issues with a "genome-free" approach that eschews linear genomic representations in favor of a pan-metagenomic graph.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.677
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it