Plataformização, tecnopopulismo e desintermediação das fontes em ataques ao jornalismo no Instagram
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo discute como o processo de plataformização pode contribuir para dilatar a crise de deslegitimação do Jornalismo. Associando a lógica de funcionamento das plataformas de redes sociais a uma retórica de descredibilização da imprensa, políticos como Jair Bolsonaro passam a utilizar as redes sociais para enunciar sua “verdade” diretamente ao seu público. Observamos o impacto dessa práxis através da análise de comentários em notícias de dois veículos brasileiros no Instagram: CNN Brasil e Folha de S. Paulo, numa amostra que compreende 33.651 intervenções. O resultado assinala uma correlação discursiva entre a gramática dos usuários e a de Bolsonaro e mostra um aumento de ataquesà imprensa em notícias relacionadas ao Presidente, configurando, assim, o poder do tecnopopulismo nas plataformas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".