КЕРАМИЧЕСКИЙ КОМПЛЕКС ПОСЕЛЕНИЯ ЗОЛОТООРДЫНСКОГО ВРЕМЕНИ В ДОЛИНЕ Р. АРТЕК (КРЫМ)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The site was discovered by the Mountain–Crimean archaeological expedition of the FSBSI IAC RAS under the leadership of V. V. Maiko in 2016. The settlement is located in the left side of the valley of the river Artek, at the western foot of Ayu–Dag mountain (Southern Coast of Crimea). The most active phase of his life was from the 1330–s for the last third of the14th century, the less active continued until the third quarter of the 15th century. In the collection of ceramics from the excavations of medieval cultural layers, about 91,8% (4290 units) are fragments of the 14th–15th century’s wares. These are building materials (tiles), containers (pithos, amphoras), kitchen utensils (unglazed and glazed vessels, lids) and specialized purposes ware (baby pot, ceramic stand, disc made of the vessel wall). Nonglazed ceramics is 99% represented by wares of South–Western Crimea group. Among the glazed ceramics, the products of the workshops of the South-Eastern Crimea are absolutely dominant (96%); the products of the Alushta workshop (> 2%) and the late-byzantine imports (<2%) make up an insignifi cant part. Vessels of the typically Golden Horde varieties and groups (the moldmade ware and kashin) were not found during excavations. This fact indicates the absence of a stable connection between the Artek settlement and the urban centers of the Jochid state and the domination of the Genoese in local trade along the southern coast of the Crimean peninsula already from the second quarter of the 14th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".