MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195574125

Phase Transitions for High-Dimensional Quadratic Discriminant Analysis with Rare and Weak Signals

2021· preprint· en· W3195574125 on OpenAlex
Wanjie Wang, Jingjing Wu, Zhigang Yao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadratic classifierMathematicsLinear discriminant analysisQuadratic equationDiscriminantMatrix (chemical analysis)OmegaCombinatoricsScatter matrixCovarianceBoundary (topology)Quadratic form (statistics)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Multivariate normal distributionApplied mathematicsMultivariate statisticsStatisticsPhysicsSupport vector machineMathematical analysisComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider a two-class classification problem where we observe samples $(X_i, Y_i)$ for i = 1, ..., n, $X_i \in \mathcal{R}^p$ and $Y_i \in \{0, 1\}$. Given $Y_i = k$, $X_i$ is assumed to follow a multivariate normal distribution with mean $\mu_k \in \mathcal{R}^k$ and covariance matrix $\Sigma_k$, $k=0,1$. Supposing a new sample $X$ from the same mixture is observed, our goal is to estimate its class label $Y$. The difficulty lies in the rarity and weakness of the differences in the mean vector and in the covariance matrices. By incorporating the quadratic terms $\Omega_k=\Sigma^{-1}_k$ from the two classes, we formulate the likelihood-based classification as a Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) problem. Hence, we propose the QDA classification method with the feature-selection step. Compared with recent work on the linear case (LDA) with $\Omega_k$ assumed to be the same, the current setting is much more general. The numerical results from real datasets support our theories and demonstrate the necessity and superiority of using QDA over LDA for classification under the rare and weak model. We set up a rare and weak model for both the mean vector and the precision matrix. With the model parameters, we clearly depict the boundary separating the region of successful classification from the region of unsuccessful classification of the newly proposed QDA with a feature-selection method, for the two cases that $\mu_k$ is either known or unknown. We also explore the region of successful classification of the QDA approach when both $\mu_k$ and $\Omega_k$ are unknown. The results again suggest that the quadratic term has a major influence over the LDA for the classification decision and classification accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it