Attitude of Iranian Orthopedic Residents towards Online Educating Programs in COVID-19 Pandemic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The current COVID-19 pandemic impose many challenges including maintain educational programs delivery obstacles. The aim of this study was to investigate orthopedics residents’ opinion towards using online methods to sustain medical education. Methods A cross sectional study applying an 8-item questionnaire was performed to investigate 150 Iranian residents’ attitudes towards online medical learning programs. Results One-hundred thirty two residents (88%) replied back the questionnaire. 89% of the participants reported they use online methods; most frequent method was online webinars by 84%. They frequently used Skyroom (76%) to take part in the educational events. Satisfaction rate for webinar was reported as well as 8.2. Weak internet connection and speed was the main problem reported by the participants. 91.8% of the residents supposed continuing the online education would be useful. Conclusion Orthopedic residents believed that Online educating programs would be favorable and useful to continue after the current pandemic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".