ZNF768 Expression Associates with High Proliferative Clinicopathological Features in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most common type of lung cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Despite important recent advances, the prognosis for LUAD patients is still unfavourable, with a 5 year-survival rate close to 15%. Improving the characterization of lung tumors is important to develop alternative options for the diagnosis and the treatment of this disease. Zinc-finger protein 768 (ZNF768) is a transcription factor that was recently shown to promote proliferation and repress senescence downstream of growth factor signaling. Although ZNF768 protein levels were found to be elevated in LUAD compared to normal lung tissue, it is currently unknown whether ZNF768 expression associates with clinicopathological features in LUAD. Here, using tissue microarrays of clinical LUAD surgical specimens collected from 364 patients, we observed that high levels of ZNF768 is a common characteristic of LUAD. We show that ZNF768 protein levels correlate with high proliferative features in LUAD, including the mitotic score and Ki-67 expression. Supporting a role for ZNF768 in promoting proliferation, we report that ZNF768 depletion severely impairs proliferation in several lung cancer cell lines in vitro. A marked decrease in the expression of key proliferative genes was observed in cancer cell lines depleted from ZNF768. Altogether, our findings support a role for ZNF768 in promoting proliferation of LUAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".