The mite <i>Varroa destructor</i> lowers the stinging response threshold of honey bees ( <i>Apis mellifera</i> )
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ecto-parasitic mite Varroa destructor is an extremely damaging biotic factor of honey bees (Apis mellifera) worldwide. The magnitude of the damage that V. destructor causes to the health of honey bees is well documented, but little is known about how it affects their behavior. For example, it is not known whether parasitism by V. destructor influences the bees’ defensive behavior, and since this behavior has evolutionary and practical implications, its study is of importance. In this research, we used a constant-current stimulator to expose worker bees to a 0.5 mA electric stimulus after being parasitized by Varroa mites to test the hypothesis that V. destructor parasitism affects the stinging response threshold of individual honey bees. Bees exposed to V. destructor parasitism stung significantly faster than control bees in each of three trials (p < 0.05) and thus, it is concluded that the irritation caused by V. destructor reduces the stinging response threshold of honey bees. The implications of these findings are discussed, as well as the need for further studies to understand how V. destructor affects neuronal processes in the honey bee to make them more defensive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it