ETHNOTAXONOMICAL STUDY OF GYMNOSPERMS OF RAZMAK NORTH WAZIRISTAN AGENCY (NWA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The research work presented was initiated to get information and report the distribution of Gymnosperms and their indigenous uses by the local inhabitants of sub-division Razmak, North Waziristan Agency (NWA). As a whole 11 plants species belonging to 4 families of gymnosperms were collected, briefly documented with botanical name, occurrence along with ethno-botanical uses and are preserved in the Department of Botany, UST Bannu. These families were Pinaceae, Taxaceae, Ephedraceae and Cupressaceae. The indigenous knowledge of local people about the use of these native and cultivated plants was collected through interview during field visits by using questionnaire. During visits, it was found that the inhabitants of the concerned area use these plants for food fodder, shelters, construction and fuel purposes and also utilized as a medicine and detergents. As These species are under high biotic pressure like over grazing, browsing and other human activities e.g. cuttings for fire wood and construction. Ruthless collection of Gymnosperms had threatened their existence and more Gymnosperms are becoming vulnerable due to their habitat destruction. Abies pindrow, Cedrus deodara and Pinus roxburghi are threatened species. There is a dire need of attention to the conservation of Gymnosperms otherwise, these Gymnosperms will be lost very soon and become extinct in this area. In view of this fact, an attempt has been made in this research work, record Gymnosperms type and their uses in Razmak area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".