MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195668664 · doi:10.21065/19257430.76.3

ETHNOTAXONOMICAL STUDY OF GYMNOSPERMS OF RAZMAK NORTH WAZIRISTAN AGENCY (NWA)

2013· article· en· W3195668664 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Muhammad Daud Khan, Sultan Mahmood Wazir, Rehman Ullah Khan, Saad Ullah Khan, Aziz Khan, Ihsan Ullah, Adnan Khatak

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Applied Sciences · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreatened speciesGymnospermPinaceaeIndigenousGeographyCupressaceaeHabitatEndangered speciesBiologyEcologyBotanyPinus <genus>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research work presented was initiated to get information and report the distribution of Gymnosperms and their indigenous uses by the local inhabitants of sub-division Razmak, North Waziristan Agency (NWA). As a whole 11 plants species belonging to 4 families of gymnosperms were collected, briefly documented with botanical name, occurrence along with ethno-botanical uses and are preserved in the Department of Botany, UST Bannu. These families were Pinaceae, Taxaceae, Ephedraceae and Cupressaceae. The indigenous knowledge of local people about the use of these native and cultivated plants was collected through interview during field visits by using questionnaire. During visits, it was found that the inhabitants of the concerned area use these plants for food fodder, shelters, construction and fuel purposes and also utilized as a medicine and detergents. As These species are under high biotic pressure like over grazing, browsing and other human activities e.g. cuttings for fire wood and construction. Ruthless collection of Gymnosperms had threatened their existence and more Gymnosperms are becoming vulnerable due to their habitat destruction. Abies pindrow, Cedrus deodara and Pinus roxburghi are threatened species. There is a dire need of attention to the conservation of Gymnosperms otherwise, these Gymnosperms will be lost very soon and become extinct in this area. In view of this fact, an attempt has been made in this research work, record Gymnosperms type and their uses in Razmak area.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Applied SciencesSame topicEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesFrench-language works237,207