Hydromagnetic Mixed Convection along a Vertical Cylinder in a Stratified Non-Darcian Porous Medium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present problem, the simultaneous heat and mass transfer by steady, laminar, incompressible, viscous and conductive to electricity combined convection flow straight a vertical cylinder placed inside a non-Darcian thermally stratified porous medium are considered.The condition of variable surface temperature and variable surface concentration are analyzed.All the regime of convection (free, mixed, and forced) will be studied.The governing nonlinear partial differential equations will be converted to nonsimilar form by using suitable transformations.Then they are solved by a finite difference method.Hydrodynamic, thermal, and concentration profiles as well as local Nusselt and Sherwood numbers that reflect the amount of heat and mass transfer will be analyzed and discussed.The results show that increasing the value of the power law index of the surface temperature of the cylinder, curvature parameter, and buoyancy ratio leads to enhance the rates of heat and mass transfer.On contrast the rates of heat and mass transfer are reduced when the value of inertia effect parameter, square of the Hartmann number, and local thermal stratification parameter are raised.Enhancing the value of Lewis number causes lowering the rate of heat transfer and growing the rate of mass transfer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".