Commentary: Evolution toward a “bespoke” Ross procedure

Central MessageNovel technical advances that stabilize the autograft for the Ross procedure may extend candidacy to include patients with primary aortic regurgitation and improve durability.See Article page 383. Novel technical advances that stabilize the autograft for the Ross procedure may extend candidacy to include patients with primary aortic regurgitation and improve durability. See Article page 383. With accumulating evidence of low perioperative mortality, favorable hemodynamics, low risk of endocarditis, long-term durability, and most importantly, a survival advantage over prosthetic valve replacement, the living pulmonary autograft is an ideal aortic valve replacement option for active young and middle-aged adult patients.1Mazine A. El-Hamamsy I. Verma S. Peterson M.D. Bonow R.O. Yacoub M.H. et al.Ross procedure in adults for cardiologists and cardiac surgeons: JACC state-of-the-art review.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 2761-2777Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar With long-term survival equal to the age- and sex-matched general population in most series, the arguments that favor use of the Ross procedure have become increasingly compelling.2Buratto E. Shi W.Y. Wynne R. Poh C.L. Larobina M. O’Keefe M. et al.Improved survival after the Ross procedure compared with mechanical aortic valve replacement.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71: 1337-1344Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar,3Aboud A. Charitos E.I. Fujita B. Sierle U. Reil J.-C. Voth V. et al.Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing the Ross procedure.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021; 77: 1412-1422Crossref PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar Younger patients may derive the greatest long-term benefit from the Ross procedure. Yet, these selected patients often have congenital bicuspid valves, with pure aortic regurgitation (AR) and a dilated aortic valve annulus. Historical data from older Ross clinical studies show that patients with primary AR are found to be at risk for reoperation due to autograft dilation with recurrent regurgitation. This has restricted use of the Ross procedure in many patients who may benefit. Fortunately, with recent technical and perioperative care pathway innovations, the benefit for these young adults with AR may be equal to, if not greater, than older patients with aortic stenosis. In this issue, Mazine and El-Hamamsy4Mazine A. El-Hamamsy I. Tailoring the Ross procedure for patients with aortic regurgitation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 10: 383-389Scopus (3) Google Scholar provide an excellent overview of Ross procedure outcomes, highlighting the concerns of progressive annular dilation in patients with AR. With a thoughtful unpacking of the contributing mechanisms, this expert team offers a successful approach to address these earlier technical shortcomings. The key elements of success are use of a tailored surgical approach to stabilize the autograft in addition to strict postoperative blood pressure control. The concept of a “bespoke” Ross operation is appealing on several levels. Unlike full external support techniques with the native root inclusion technique or encasement of the autograft in a Dacron tube, the “nonwrapped” approach maintains the dynamic motion of the autograft root and optimizes hemodynamics. It is recognized that recurrent AR can result from progressive dilation of the native ascending aorta, and the autograft, at the sinotubular junction (STJ). To address this, a Dacron annuloplasty at the STJ, in patients with a dilated ascending aorta, acts to prevent dilation and AR by mitigating displacement of the autograft's commissures. More proximally, an extra-aortic ring annuloplasty is used to prevent proximal dilation at the level of the ventriculoaortic junction (annulus). The value of an STJ annuloplasty and the effectiveness of an external ring annuloplasty, rather than subcommissural annuloplasty stitches, which are known to fail, are lessons learned through experience with aortic valve repair.5Boodhwani M. El Khoury G. Aortic valve repair: indications and outcomes.Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014; 16: 490Crossref PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar These technical nuances are transferrable from aortic valve repair techniques and are a valuable component of the contemporary Ross procedure. It is reasonable to assume, based on emerging evidence, that these modifications will translate into better long-term durability of the pulmonary autograft.1Mazine A. El-Hamamsy I. Verma S. Peterson M.D. Bonow R.O. Yacoub M.H. et al.Ross procedure in adults for cardiologists and cardiac surgeons: JACC state-of-the-art review.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 72: 2761-2777Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar This adds important technical detail and support for the Ross procedure as an excellent option for young and middle-aged patients, including those with AR who are not amenable to repair. Tailoring the Ross procedure for patients with aortic regurgitationJTCVS TechniquesVol. 10PreviewAortic valve repair and aortic valve-sparing operations represent the best options to treat aortic regurgitation (AR) in nonelderly adults.1,2 When performed by expert surgeons, these operations are safe and result in good durability and freedom from valve-related complications, leading to excellent long-term survival.3,4 When the aortic valve cannot be repaired or spared, valve replacement becomes essential. The vast majority of patients who undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) will receive a bioprosthetic or mechanical valve. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.