Comprehensive Rehabilitation of Acupuncture Combined with Sequential Therapy of DL-3 n-Butylphthalide for Subacute Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this trial was to examine the effect of acupuncture combined with 90 days’ NBP continuous habitual therapy and routine rehabilitation training could more effectively improve the physical movement, life activities, cognitive and psychological disorders of stroke patients. Our trial was a double-center trial and retrospective cohort study. The Acupuncture group received additional bedside acupuncture treatment and was given NBP injection 100ml twice a day in the first 14 days, and sequential NBP soft capsule 200mg three times a day in the next 76 days. The No Acupuncture group only received conventional rehabilitation treatment. Primary outcomes were NIHSS, ADL and mRS which were evaluated in 6 months. Secondary outcomes included MMSE, MoCA, HAMA and HAMD; all were evaluated in 6 months. And the adverse reaction or other serious adverse events were evaluated at each time. We found that this therapy could significantly increase the scores of ADL, MMSE, MoCA, decreased the scores of NIHSS, mRS and the incidence of HAMA, HAMD of patients with ischemic stroke (P<0.05), which indicated that comprehensive rehabilitation of acupuncture as an additional therapy combined with the 90 days’ NBP sequential therapy could improve the cognitive, psychological and behavioral functions of ischemic stroke without significant side effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".