A Numerical Study on the Exact Onset of Flow Instabilities in Thermo-Solutal Marangoni Convection Driven by Opposing Forces in a Half-Zone Liquid Bridge under Zero Gravity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theoretical onset of the Marangoni convection instability occurring in a half-zone liquid bridge of the floating zone (FZ) growth of SixGe1–x has been investigated by numerical simulations. A half-zone model of the liquid bridge between a cold (bottom plane) and a hot (top plane) disk is considered. The highest Si concentration is on the top of the liquid bridge. Therefore, the driving forces for thermal and solutal Marangoni flows are in opposite directions in this configuration. The nonlinear equilibria and periodic orbits are obtained using the Newton–Krylov method, and their stability is analyzed with global linear stability analysis. A flow bifurcation analysis is conducted. The results show that when the solutal Marangoni number, MaC, ≤360, the primary flow bifurcation is from 2D axisymmetric to 3D steady flow. When MaC>360, the 2D axisymmetric flow becomes weakly periodic 2D axisymmetric, and eventually becomes chaotic. The critical thermal Marangoni number is monotonically increasing as MaC increases, and the flow is 2D axisymmetric when the solutal Marangoni forceis dominant. The stability evaluation for various thermal Marangoni number values at MaC=893 reveals that the onset of transition is from steady to periodic. However, the reverse transition does not occur at the same Marangoni number value. The simulation results show that the hysteresis behavior of the flow field exhibits an approximately 1% difference between two critical thermal Marangoni numbers. The present study suggests that the control parameters of FZ crystal growth should be smaller than the calculated critical values to avoid any flow-induced disturbances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".