MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195814863 · doi:10.1002/cjs.11652

Not all long‐memory estimators are born equal: The case of nonstationary functional time series

2021· article· en· W3195814863 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Han Lin Shang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Statistics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorFunctional principal component analysisAutoregressive modelMathematicsSeries (stratigraphy)Autoregressive fractionally integrated moving averageHurst exponentMonte Carlo methodContext (archaeology)Principal component analysisApplied mathematicsStatisticsLong memoryEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study a functional version of fractionally integrated time series that covers the nonstationary case when the memory parameter d is above 0.5. We project time series, with varying levels of nonstationarity, onto a finite‐dimensional subspace. We obtain the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions that span a sample version of the dominant subspace through dynamic functional principal component analysis of the sample long‐run covariance functions. Within the context of functional autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average models, we evaluate and compare finite‐sample bias and mean‐squared error among some time‐ and frequency‐domain Hurst exponent estimators via Monte Carlo simulations. We apply the estimators to Canadian female and male life‐table death counts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of StatisticsSame topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207