Producción científica de la Escuela de Enfermería de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. 2003
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Se presenta una sintesis de la produccion cientifica de la Escuela de Enfermeria de la Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile entre enero y diciembre del ano 2003. Se desarrollaron 35 estudios de investigacion. De ellos, el 54,2% no fueron concursados y se desarrollaron como parte del trabajo docente y clinico, revelando la motivacion y compromiso de las profesoras con la produccion de conocimiento propio de la disciplina. El 45,7% son estudios colaborativos con instituciones extranjeras que reciben fondos de CIDA en Canada y Fogarty/NIH de Estados Unidos. El 11,4% corresponde a proyectos financiados con fondos propios. Las profesoras hicieron 46 publicaciones entre capitulos de libros, articulos de revistas, resumenes de investigaciones en congresos internacionales y nacionales y otros. La produccion academica de la Escuela se ha mantenido estable y presenta mejor calidad y competitividad, lo que ofrece solidez y garantia de excelencia progresiva en su ser formador.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".