Producción científica de la Escuela de Enfermería de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. 2003
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a synthesis of academica production in international and national research projects and studies development by the academic staff that teaches at School of Nursing of Catholic University of Chile. Between January and December of 2003.35 research studies was done by professors. From this studies, 54,2% doesn't have any financial support, so they were developed as part of clinical and teaching work. This reveals high level of motivation and engagement of the staff of professors with constructing nursing knowledge. 45, 7% are studies done as part of collaborative research with international funds as CIDA/ Canada and Fogarty/NIH/USA. 11,4% are studies that have internal financial support from the Direction of Research of the School of Nursing. During the year, professors did 46 publications (book chapters, international and national journals, abstracts in books of international and national research or professional meetings). Academic production of professors of the School of Nursing shows stability and improve quality and competitiveness that offers a guarantee of progressive excellence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".