Research on Roadside Unit-Assisted Cooperative Positioning Method for a Connected Vehicle Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid development of intelligent transportation systems and connected vehicle (CV) technology, vehicle-to-infrastructure communication technologies have provided new solutions to traditional traffic safety and efficiency issues. However, the current intelligent CVs often provide positioning services only through a single GPS. These modules’ positioning accuracy can be insufficient to support the safety and reliability of security applications. The question arises of how to enhance GPS positioning accuracy in a CV environment without adding additional equipment and using only the information that existing CV devices can access. This paper proposes a roadside unit (RSU)-assisted GPS-RSS (received signal strength) cooperative positioning method for a CV environment. The rough position information from GPS is combined with RSS ranging and dead reckoning to obtain preliminary position estimated coordinates of the CV. Bayesian filtering is performed to obtain a more accurate preliminary position estimate. The final position estimated coordinates, obtained after data fusion, are combined with the high-precision map data (MAP) sent by the RSU to match the lane where the vehicle is located. Simulation and field tests verify each other, and the results show that the lane positioning accuracy of GPS can be improved by 21% within the range from the RSU to the CV’s on-board unit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".