Alts: An Adaptive Load Balanced Task Scheduling Approach for Cloud Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
According to the research, many task scheduling approaches have been proposed like GA, ACO, etc., which have improved the performance of the cloud data centers concerning various scheduling parameters. The task scheduling problem is NP-hard, as the key reason is the number of solutions/combinations grows exponentially with the problem size, e.g., the number of tasks and the number of computing resources. Thus, it is always challenging to have complete optimal scheduling of the user tasks. In this research, we proposed an adaptive load-balanced task scheduling (ALTS) approach for cloud computing. The proposed task scheduling algorithm maps all incoming tasks to the available VMs in a load-balanced way to reduce the makespan, maximize resource utilization, and adaptively minimize the SLA violation. The performance of the proposed task scheduling algorithm is evaluated and compared with the state-of-the-art task scheduling ACO, GA, and GAACO approaches concerning average resource utilization (ARUR), Makespan, and SLA violation. The proposed approach has revealed significant improvements concerning the makespan, SLA violation, and resource utilization against the compared approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".