MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Introduction: Dignity's Special Issue on the Chab Dai Coalition's Butterfly Longitudinal Research Project

2021· article· en· W3195959606 on OpenAlex
Leslie M. Tutty

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDignity A Journal of Analysis of Exploitation and Violence · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDignityButterflyStigma (botany)Longitudinal studyCriminologyPsychologyPolitical scienceMedicineEcologyPsychiatryLawBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

is pleased to partner with the Chab Dai Coalition's Butterfly Longitudinal Research Project to present this special edition on the major findings of the project on the sexual exploitation of individuals in Cambodia. This collection of seven peer-reviewed articles represents a significant body of research, following the lives of 128 Cambodian child and adult survivors of human trafficking, exploitation and abuse over a ten-year period. The articles touch on numerous aspects of the lives of these individuals including the social determinants of health, justice system responses, stigma and the difficulties re-integrating back into their communities. One article is specific to the experiences of the study's male cohort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it