MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identification of Icing Thickness Based on the On-line Monitoring of Insulators

2021· article· en· W3196025452 on OpenAlexaff
Qiran Li, Yong Liu, M. Farzaneh, Boxue Du

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIcingEdge detectionCanny edge detectorComputer visionDeriche edge detectorGrayscaleComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionNoise (video)Image gradientImage processingImage (mathematics)MeteorologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to obtain the icing characteristic parameters in time, the on-line monitoring method was used to extract the features of insulators for prevent the icing disaster. The ice thickness of insulators is identified by the monitoring device ZHY810C according to the edge detection algorithm of Canny operator, which is significant for the ice disaster prevention in extreme environment. The calculation model of icing thickness is established by digital image processing technology and intelligent algorithm. The Gaussian low-pass filtering radius is conducted to reduce image noise and to sharpen image edge and then the gradient of grayscale is calculated. After that, the non-maximum suppression threshold and double threshold algorithm are chosen to detect the optimal edge point from the icing image. Finally, the icing image can be thinned based on the region growth method. Hence, the icing thickness of insulators can be monitored in real-time by the online monitoring equipment ZHY810C and calculated by Canny operator edge detection algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.199

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207