Optimal Motion Planning in GPS-Denied Environments Using Nonlinear Model Predictive Horizon
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Navigating robotic systems autonomously through unknown, dynamic and GPS-denied environments is a challenging task. One requirement of this is a path planner which provides safe trajectories in real-world conditions such as nonlinear vehicle dynamics, real-time computation requirements, complex 3D environments, and moving obstacles. This paper presents a methodological motion planning approach which integrates a novel local path planning approach with a graph-based planner to enable an autonomous vehicle (here a drone) to navigate through GPS-denied subterranean environments. The local path planning approach is based on a recently proposed method by the authors called Nonlinear Model Predictive Horizon (NMPH). The NMPH formulation employs a copy of the plant dynamics model (here a nonlinear system model of the drone) plus a feedback linearization control law to generate feasible, optimal, smooth and collision-free paths while respecting the dynamics of the vehicle, supporting dynamic obstacles and operating in real time. This design is augmented with computationally efficient algorithms for global path planning and dynamic obstacle mapping and avoidance. The overall design is tested in several simulations and a preliminary real flight test in unexplored GPS-denied environments to demonstrate its capabilities and evaluate its performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it