MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196096170 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.09810

ICLR 2021 Challenge for Computational Geometry & Topology: Design and Results

2021· preprint· en· W3196096170 on OpenAlexaff
Nina Miolane, Matteo Caorsi, Marius Guerard, Nicolas Guigui, Johan Mathe, Yann Cabanes, Wojciech Reise, Thomas Davies, António Leitão, Somesh Mohapatra, Saiteja Utpala, S. Shailja, Gabriele Corso, Guoxi Liu, Federico Iuricich, Andrei Manolache, Mihaela Nistor, Matei Bejan, Armand Mihai Nicolicioiu, Bogdan-Alexandru Luchian, Mihai‐Sorin Stupariu, Florent Michel, Khanh Dao Duc, Bilal Abdulrahman, Maxim Beketov, Elodie Maignant, Zhiyuan Liu, Marek Černý, Martin Bauw, Santiago Velasco-Forero, Jesús Angulo, Yanan Long

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTopological and Geometric Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopology (electrical circuits)Computational topologyGeometry and topologyRepresentation (politics)Computer scienceGeometryMathematicsPolitical scienceCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the computational challenge on differential geometry and topology that happened within the ICLR 2021 workshop "Geometric and Topological Representation Learning". The competition asked participants to provide creative contributions to the fields of computational geometry and topology through the open-source repositories Geomstats and Giotto-TDA. The challenge attracted 16 teams in its two month duration. This paper describes the design of the challenge and summarizes its main findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.053
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.115

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.053
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0060.014
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.096 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicTopological and Geometric Data AnalysisFrench-language works237,207