MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196102495 · doi:10.31399/asm.cp.itsc2000p0045

A New Sensor for On-Line Monitoring the Temperature and Velocity of Thermal Spray Particles

2000· article· en· W3196102495 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles Bourque, Mario Lamontagne, Christian Moreau

Bibliographic record

VenueThermal spray · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPyrometerOpticsTemperature measurementWavelengthMaterials scienceParticle (ecology)Radiant intensityJet (fluid)ThermalMagnificationOptical fiberIntensity (physics)Particle velocityRadiationPhysicsAcousticsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, we describe a new sensor for monitoring inflight particles in thermal spray processes. The sensor can measure simultaneously and in real-time, the mean velocity and mean temperature of the particle jet for a very broad range of powder feed rates. The thermal radiation emitted by the hot particles is collected by a lens and focused on two optical fibers. Knowing the distance between the optical fibers and the magnification of the optics, the mean particle velocity is computed by measuring the time delay between the signals collected in the two fibers by cross-correlation. The signals are band-pass filtered to prevent spurious reflection, equipment movement and noise from disturbing the measurement. Using the same signals filtered at two specific wavelengths, the mean temperature of the particle jet is obtained by the two-color pyrometry technique. In this technique, the temperature is computed from the ratio of the light intensity detected at two different wavelengths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermal spraySame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207