Evolution of the primate glutamate taste sensor from a nucleotide sensor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here, we demonstrate that the l-Glu sensitivity of T1R1/T1R3 is a derived state that has evolved repeatedly in large primates that rely on leaves as protein sources, after their divergence from insectivorous ancestors. Receptor expression experiments show that common amino acid substitutions at ligand binding sites that render T1R1/T1R3 sensitive to l-Glu occur independently at least three times in primate evolution. Meanwhile T1R1/T1R3 senses 5'-ribonucleotides as opposed to l-Glu in several mammalian species, including insectivorous primates. Our chemical analysis reveal that l-Glu is one of the major free amino acids in primate diets and that insects, but not leaves, contain large amounts of free 5'-ribonucleotides. Altering the ligand-binding preference of T1R1/T1R3 from 5'-ribonucleotides to l-Glu might promote leaf consumption, overcoming bitter and aversive tastes. Altogether, our results provide insight into the foraging ecology of a diverse mammalian radiation and help reveal how evolution of sensory genes facilitates invasion of new ecological niches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".