Identifikasi Legibilitas pada Koridor Jalan Affandi, Sleman
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Masyarakat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta mengenal Jalan Affandi sebagai kawasan komersial sebagai dampak kawasan pendukung kawasan pendidikan (yang lebih dahulu dibangun) di sekitarnya. Pada saat ini pertumbuhan ekonomi yang cukup pesat pada koridor Jalan Affandi menyebabkan pembangunan area kawasan komersial yang tidak terkendali dan bangkitan aktivitas kawasan pendukungnya yang tidak diselaraskan dengan perancangan karakter visual yang baik sehingga dikhawatirkan akan membingungkan pengamat serta menghilangkan legibilitas pada suatu koridor Jalan Affandi. Studi ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan penjelasan deskriptif naratif. Studi ini meneliti mengenai legibilitas koridor Jalan Affandi menggunakan elemen citra kota Lynch dengan metode wawancana dan mental mapping dengan purposive sampling. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dan dikaji kembali dengan teori, dapat diketahui bahwa legibilitas pada koridor Jalan Affandi belum semuanya jelas dan merata. Elemen yang paling menonjol di Koridor Jalan Affandi adalah district dan Edge dan yang tidak menonjol adalah elemen Nodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".