MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3196255569 · doi:10.5194/tc-2021-249

A new sea ice state dependent parameterization for the free drift of sea ice

2021· article· en· W3196255569 on OpenAlexafffund
Charles Brunette, Bruno Tremblay, R. Newton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity College LondonMarine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response NetworkMcGill UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsBuoySea iceWind speedGeologySea ice thicknessSea ice concentrationDrift iceWind stressEnvironmental scienceClimatologyGeodesyMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesArctic ice packPhysicsOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Free drift estimates of sea ice motion are necessary to produce a seamless observational record combining buoy and satellite-derived sea ice motion vectors. We develop a new parameterization for the free drift of sea ice based on wind forcing, wind turning angle, sea ice state variables (concentration and thickness) and ocean current (as a residual). Building on the fact that the spatially varying standard wind-ice transfer coefficient (considering only surface wind stress) has a structure as the spatial distribution of sea ice thickness, we introduce a wind-ice transfer coefficient that scales linearly with thickness. Results show a mean error of −0.5 cm/s (low-speed bias) and a root-mean-square error of 5.1 cm/s, considering daily buoy drift data as truth. This represents a 31 % reduction of the error on drift speed compared to the free drift estimates used in the Polar Pathfinder dataset. The thickness-dependent wind transfer coefficient provides an improved seasonality and long-term trend of the sea ice drift speed, with a minimum (maximum) drift speed in May (October), compared to July (January) for the constant wind transfer coefficient parameterizations which simply follow the peak in mean surface wind stresses. The trend in sea ice drift in this new model is +0.45 cm/s decade−1 compared with +0.39 cm/s decade−1 from the buoy observations, whereas there is essentially no trend in the standard free drift parameterization (−0.01 cm/s decade−1) or the Polar Pathfinder free drifts (−0.03 cm/s decade−1). The wind turning angle that minimize the cost function is equal of 25°, with a mean and root-mean square error of +2.6° and 51° on the direction of the drift, respectively. The residual from the minimization procedure (i.e. the ocean currents) resolves key large scale features such as the Beaufort Gyre and Transpolar Drift Stream, and is in good agreement with ocean state estimates from the ECCO, GLORYS and PIOMAS ice-ocean reanalyses, and geostrophic currents from dynamical ocean topography, with a root-mean-square difference of 2.4, 2.9, 2.6 and 3.8 cm/s, respectively. Finally, a repeat of the analysis on a two sub-section of the time series (pre- and post-2000) clearly shows the acceleration of the Beaufort Gyre (particularly along the Alaskan coastline) and an expansion of the gyre in the post-2000 concurrent with a thinning of the sea ice cover and observations acceleration of the ice drift speed and ocean current. This new dataset is publicly available for complementing merged observations-based sea ice drift datasets that includes satellite and buoy drift records.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→