MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196258207 · doi:10.1109/mim.2021.9513635

DTCoach: Your Digital Twin Coach on the Edge During COVID-19 and Beyond

2021· article· en· W3196258207 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDigital Transformation in Industry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentical twinsDomain (mathematical analysis)Computer scienceReplicaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionDigital healthArtificial intelligenceHealth careMedicineDiseaseMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Digital Twin (DT) is a digital replica of a living or non-living entity, called “real twin.” Data is collected from the real twin and analyzed using Artificial Intelligence (AI), which subsequently provides the real twin with valuable feedback. One of the most promising applications for humans is the DT for health and well-being [1]. Although the DT technology has been widely adopted in industries such as the manufacturing industry, where it has proven highly beneficial, its use in the domain of health is in its infancy. Few researchers have addressed the DT for health. Such is the work in [2] where a DT is proposed for heart disease detection, or in [3] that presents an ecosystem of the DT in the domain of well-being where the real twin's physical activity is measured by the digital twin, which then provides feedback in real-time to the real twin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.890

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it