Cell Models for Chromosome 20q11.21 Amplification and Drug Sensitivities in Colorectal Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and objectives: The chromosome locus 20q11.21 is a commonly amplified locus in colorectal cancer, with a prevalence of 8% to 9%. Several candidate cancer-associated genes are transcribed from the locus. The therapeutic implications of the amplification in colorectal cancer remain unclear. Materials and Methods: Preclinical cell line models of colorectal cancer included in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) collection were examined for the presence of amplifications in 20q11.21 genes. Correlations of the presence of 20q11.21 amplifications with gene essentialities and drug sensitivities were surveyed on salient databases for determination of therapeutic leads. Results: A significant subset of colorectal cancer cell lines in the CCLE (12 of 63 cell lines, 19%) bear amplifications of genes located at 20q11.21. Cancer-associated genes of the locus include ASXL1, DNMT3B, BCL2L1, TPX2, KIF3B and POFUT1. These genes are all amplified in the 12 cell lines, but they are variably over-expressed at the mRNA level, compared to non-amplified lines. 20q11.21 amplified cell lines are sensitive to various tyrosine kinase inhibitors and are resistant to chemotherapy drugs targeting the mitotic apparatus and microtubules. CRISPR and RNAi dependencies screening revealed, besides the β-catenin and KRAS genes, a few recurrent gene dependencies in more than one cell line, including YAP1 and JUP. Conclusions: Cell line models of colorectal cancer with 20q11.21 gene amplifications display dependencies on the presence of specific genes and resistance or sensitivity to specific drugs and drug categories. Observations from in vitro models may form the basis for clinical drug development in this subtype of colorectal cancer. Genetic lesions conferring synthetic lethality to certain drugs or categories of drugs could be discovered with this approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".