RGS4-Deficiency Alters Intracellular Calcium and PKA-Mediated Control of Insulin Secretion in Glucose-Stimulated Beta Islets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of diverse G-protein signaling pathways have been shown to regulate insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells. Accordingly, regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins have also been implicated in coordinating this process. One such protein, RGS4, is reported to show both positive and negative effects on insulin secretion from β-cells depending on the physiologic context under which it was studied. We here use an RGS4-deficient mouse model to characterize previously unknown G-protein signaling pathways that are regulated by RGS4 during glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from the pancreatic islets. Our data show that loss of RGS4 results in a marked deficiency in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion during both phase I and phase II of insulin release in intact mice and isolated islets. These deficiencies are associated with lower cAMP/PKA activity and a loss of normal calcium surge (phase I) and oscillatory (phase II) kinetics behavior in the RGS4-deficient β-cells, suggesting RGS4 may be important for regulation of both Gαi and Gαq signaling control during glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Together, these studies add to the known list of G-protein coupled signaling events that are controlled by RGS4 during glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and highlight the importance of maintaining normal levels of RGS4 function in healthy pancreatic tissues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".