An Analytical Approach for the Nonlinear Free Vibration Analysis of Thin-Walled Circular Cylindrical Shells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a new formulation combining the nonlinear theory of Novozhilov with the classical finite element method for the purpose of evaluating the vibratory characteristics of thin, closed and isotropic cylindrical shells. The theory developed in this paper is able to include the shell curvature effect in the circumferential direction of the orthogonal displacements and considers the impact of initial geometric imperfections on the dynamic response of the system. The formulation first takes a general form by expressing the shell displacements as an alliance between the generalized coordinates and spatial functions. Nonlinear kinematic relationships are inferred from Novozhilov’s theory. The equations of motion as well as the expressions of the mass, linear and nonlinear stiffness matrices are derived through the Lagrange method by considering the coupling between the different modes. An application of this model is illustrated in a further step, by adopting the displacement functions derived from exact solutions of linear Sanders’ theory equilibrium equations for thin cylindrical shells. The governing equations of motion are solved with the help of a direct iterative method. Linear and nonlinear frequencies are validated by comparison with the results in the literature. The relative nonlinear frequencies are determined as a function of vibration amplitudes and then compared with published results for several cases of shells. Excellent agreement is observed between the results derived from this theory and those found in the literature. The effect of different parameters including axial and circumferential wave number, length-to-radius ratio, thickness-to-radius ratio and various boundary conditions, on the nonlinear frequencies of cylindrical shells is investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".