MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196353934 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2021.3107808

Distance Estimation in Visible Light Communications: The Case of Imperfect Synchronization and Signal-Dependent Noise

2021· article· en· W3196353934 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Raza Cheema, Malek Alsmadi, Salama Ikki

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterVisible light communicationAsynchronous communicationSynchronization (alternating current)Computer scienceNoise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Electronic engineeringReal-time computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the error bounds for distance estimation in visible light communication (VLC) systems. More precisely, we study the effect of signal-dependent shot noise (SDSN) on the estimation error bounds for both synchronous and asynchronous systems. Moreover, a bi-directional synchronization protocol is exploited, which can mitigate the effects of clock-biasing between the transmitter and receiver. The results demonstrate that SDSN negatively affects the distance estimation bounds for all considered scenarios. Furthermore, the bi-directional distance estimation protocol outperforms the directional estimation techniques even in the case of perfect synchronization between the transmitter and receiver.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.036
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.036
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207