Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Intercanine and intermolar width are key measurements fordiagnosis and orthodontic treatment planning. The aim of current study was to determine themean maxillary intercanine arch width (ICW) of untreated normal arch Pakistani patients and tocompare it with other populations. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Orthodonticdepartment, Faisalabad Medical University. Period: 1/12/2016 to 1/11/2017. Materialand Methods: ICW measurements on dental casts of 60 normal occlusion patients. ICW wasmeasured using digital caliper between the maxillary canine cusp tips. The Non probabilityconsecutive sampling technique was used in this study. All the data collected was analyzeby using SPSS software (version 21.0.0). Results: In our study the mean age of the patientswas 19.11±3.13 years. The mean value of maxillary ICW of the normal occlusion orthodonticpatients was 35.21±3.31 mm. Conclusion: Our study results concluded that well alignedarches and ideal occlusions can be achieved in Pakistanis with maxillary intercanine width asnarrow as 35.21±3.31 mm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".