MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196365249

“Turning a Man’s Life Right Around”: Wallace’s Rehabilitation of Frederick Exley in IJ

2020· article· en· W3196365249 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeff Staiger

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars' Bank (University of Oregon) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistory of Medical Practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

s Rehabilitation of Frederick Exley in IJAmong the throng of influences, literary and philosophical, major and minor, patent and hidden, absorbed by Infinite Jest, Ulysses, along with Hamlet, is among the most central.Joyce's magnum opus serves for Wallace as a model and inspiration not just for particular setpieces, in the way, say, that DeLillo's End Zone provides the intertext for the Eschaton episode or Pynchon's "The Courier's Tragedy" (from The Crying of Lot 49) serves as the antecedent of the "Blood Sister" sequence, but for the very gestalt and make-up of Wallace's novel as a whole.Its encyclopedism, its verbal maximalism, its kaleidoscopic play with narrative techniques -all the elements that give it its burgeoning, prodigious identity derive from its Joycean precedent.So, too, does the dynamic between the novel's main characters harken back to its predecessor.1 Both novels follow the paths of two protagonists, one a melancholic authorial surrogate and the other an extroverted Everyman, through their respective fictional worlds; and the opposition between their temperaments becomes the basis of an implicit metafictional argument about the novel's own condition of possibility.The younger figure needs to attain the broader sensibilitymore open, more humane, more resourceful --exhibited by the older man and so realize the capacities that will allow him to body forth the fictional world that contains them, an achievement to which the existence of the novel in the reader's hands self-referentially attests.Of course, Wallace introduces several twists on this correlation.The invocation of the Joycean analog provides a basis of expectation which allows him to throw into relief the distinctive features of his own thematic concerns.So the climactic meeting of the two protagonist towards which Joyce's novel builds and which Wallace's reader hopes for is withheld; or rather, it has already been hinted at in the course of Hal's rambling soliloquy in the novel's opening section set at an unspecified time after the rest of novel's action --an epilogue given in a flashback in a prolog that takes place after the events to be narrated in the novel -when he fleetingly alludes to their meeting, along with the Canadian John Wayne, at the grave of Hal's father.That this meeting restages the graveyard scene in Hamlet, from which the novel derives its very title, while the grave is that of James Orin Incandenza, or JOI, the promethean auteur who embodies the novel's parody/homage to Joyce, suggests the thoroughness with which Ulysses and Hamlet are entwined in Wallace's novel.For all that in his portrayal of Gately Wallace carries out an ambitious, audacious reworking of Joyce, that portrayal, as I will demonstrate in what follows, draws upon yet another intertext: A Fan's Notes by Frederick Exley.The largely forgotten Exley might on the face of it seem like an unlikely author for Wallace to pair with Joyce in the creation of a character so important to his project.2 Yet Wallace's use of Exley in the fashioning of his Joycean Everyman is not only an example of his procedure, a fundamental imperative of Wallace's poetics, of combining and layering his intertexts, but also of the radical conception of intertextuality in which he imitated not only Joyce's work, but the very process, the working method, by which Joyce brought that work into being.3 Just as Joyce based the portrayal of Bloom on his friend, the Italian novelist, Italo Svevo, author of the seminal modernist work, The Conscience of Zeno, Wallace, following the same path, draws on the biographical details of a contemporary novelist for his portrayal of Gately.* The big difference is that whereas Joyce drew upon direct knowledge of his actual friend to form his fictional character, there is no evidence that Wallace knew or had any dealings with the flesh-and-blood Exley, who died of alcoholism in 1991, * Both Joyce and Svevo were working on their respective novels in Trieste during the war; Ulysses appeared in 1922, The Conscience of Zeno, with Joyce's help, in 1923.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars' Bank (University of Oregon)Same topicHistory of Medical PracticeFrench-language works237,207