MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of point defects in armchair graphene nanoribbons for biosensing of Methanethiol biomarkers: A DFT Study

2021· article· en· W3196429047 on OpenAlexafffund
Paramjot Singh, Parsoua Abedini Sohi, Mojtaba Kahrizi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMethanethiolGrapheneVacancy defectMaterials scienceAdsorptionDensity functional theoryBand gapGraphene nanoribbonsBiosensorChemical physicsNanotechnologySulfurOptoelectronicsComputational chemistryChemistryCrystallographyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, we probe the surface engineered (vacancy and Stone Wales defective) hydrogen passivated armchair graphene nanoribbon with a width of 7 atoms as a biosensing material to detect methanethiol biomarkers. Induction of defects results in the decrement of the bandgap by the formation of the trapping states. After geometry optimisation, it is found that only vacancy induced armchair graphene nanoribbon can form strong binding with the biomarker, whereas Stone Wales defect induced armchair graphene nanoribbon show disassociation with the biomarker by having positive adsorption energy. Using density functional theory, the electronic properties of a vacancy-induced armchair graphene nanoribbon with and without adsorption of methanethiol are calculated, showing that methanethiol adsorption leads to increment in the bandgap of the host material by eliminating the trapping states. The work function and electron affinity change after adsorption. As there are significant changes in the electronic properties, vacancy induced armchair graphene nanoribbon show high sensing capabilities toward methanethiol biomarkers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207