Assessment of the Water Qualitative Characteristics of the Tigris River Passing Through the City of Mosul and Calculating the Water Quality Index Coefficient
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quality of the water of the TigrisRiver passing through the city of Mosul was studied, starting from the Kubba area in the north to the Yarmajah area in the south, and the TigrisRiver is the only water resource for the city. The Physical and Chemical propertiesof river water was conducted, which included (water temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, turbidity, dissolved oxygen and some positive and negative ions), and the Canadian Water Quality Index = (WQI) was used to express the quality of river water. Tigris as it passes in the city of Mosul. The results indicated that the water of the TigrisRiver passing through the city of Mosul tends towards alkalinity, and the river water has good ventilation, as the average dissolved oxygen values ranged between (8.3-9.3) mg / liter. The ions of nitrates, orthophosphates, sulphates and chlorides showed a variation in their concentrations during the study period. The rates of sodium and potassium ion concentrations ranged between (19.9-24.6) and (2.6-4.2) mg / liter, respectively. The studied water was classified as (good - moderate) for drinking, as the values of the water quality index ranged between (76.7-91.2). The index values ranged between (86.3-99.6) and the water was classified as excellent too good for the river conservation system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".