MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196497445 · doi:10.21423/aabppro20035311

Monitoring Subclinical Ketosis Using Milk Strip Test and Control Chart in Dairy Herds

2003· article· en· W3196497445 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luc DesCôteaux, T.F. Duffield, Anne-Marie Bélanger, Émile Bouchard, M. Brodeur, Cécile Ferrouillet, Randal Bagg, J. Baril

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference Proceedings · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsEli Lilly (Canada)University of GuelphUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKetosisHerdMedicineSubclinical infectionAnimal scienceDisease controlMilk productionDairy cattleVeterinary medicineInternal medicineBiologyEnvironmental healthEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subclinical ketosis (SCK), based on a serum betahydroxybutyrate (BHB) concentration ≥1400 μmol/L (14.4 mg/dL), is a metabolic disease that has been associated with reduced milk production and increased risk of other metabolic disorders. Duffield et al (2001) have reported a median prevalence of SCK of 41% among 25 dairy herds, and a within-herd prevalence ranging between 8 and 80%. A milk strip cow-side test (Keto-Test, Elanco Animal Health, Guelph, Ontario) has been shown to have a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 74% to detect SCK in dairy cows when using a cut-off value of 100 μmol/L of BHB (Osborne et al, 2002). Statistical Process Control (SPC) and the use of Control Charts are tools that can be used in order to monitor health status in production medicine programs. Our objectives are to provide an overview of the SPC and Control Charts and to present a practical application of this tool using milk Keto-Test to monitor SCK in dairy herds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Association of Bovine Practitioners Conference ProceedingsSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207